Lawyer in OW Bunker case fined for conflict of interest
Law firm Bruun & Hjejle, which represents institutional investors in the compensation case against OW Bunker, has been accused of a conflict of interest in the case, according to the Danish Bar and Law Society.
BY JESPER HØBERG | KRISTOFFER BRAHM
Several of the country's biggest investors, headed by pension funds ATP and PFA, have run into an obstacle in their DKK 767 million (USD 120 million) compensation claims case against key players in the collapsed OW Bunker group.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
Read the whole article
Get access for 14 days for free. No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.
With your free trial you get:
- Access all locked articles
- Receive our daily newsletters
- Access our app
Get full access for you and your coworkers
Start a free company trial todayRelated articles:
OW investors sue Morgan Stanley and Carnegie
For subscribers
OW investors sue IPO banks for DKK 500 million
For subscribers
OW trustees will raise claims against former management
For subscribers
